...'Anna Lascari’s latest computer-based interactive installation, Random Identity Forum (RIF), appears in the form of an entertaining video game, almost: ‘design your own flag; create a new European Union’. One enters Lascari’s website to find a black background with instructions on how to play. An interactive forum, RIF is a place where one can cast a visual vote based on one’s political and inter/national beliefs. The participant has the option to compose a new flag based on the 25 existing EU member countries. By choosing however high a percentage of whichever flag one chooses to preserve, the interactive voter creates a new flag, which can then be distributed to other fellow voters, or printed as a document. On the page ‘How to Play’, the artist has the following quotation posted from the official EU website Europa: ‘The idea of a citizens’ Europe is very new. Making it a reality will mean, among other things, rallying popular support for symbols that represent a shared European identity’ [my emphasis]. Indeed, RIF is an invitation to all citizens of the 25 member states to create a vision of another European Union. During an age of increasing disaffection with Western politics and leaders, people are inclined to want to take more power into their own hands. If the flag of the European Union – a circle of 12 golden stars on a blue background – has symbolic value, Lascari’s forum offers a space in which we can replace the existing symbol with multi-colours, creating different patterns according to our vision. But aesthetics and politics are not separate entities, and RIF does not seem to be advocating this either. Quite the contrary, it is through a political art that Lascari might be proposing a revisable EU, perhaps an EU whose symbolic consequence is found in a hybrid of identities and not a union comprised of countries with a definite distinctiveness under the auspice of a unilateral coalition.
Lascari’s project is powerful for the commentary it makes on the continuous issues which arises with the EU’s efforts to arrive at an influential position in world politics. However, it is the way in which the commentary is made that allows RIF to enthrall the viewer. Irony is a clever way by which to invert our expectations, and RIF does this successfully. We are invited into a meeting area to think about and modify the identities to be represented in a new EU flag, and the way to do this is by no means to do it randomly, as the title of the work ironically suggests. If neither the percentages of identities that the participant is invited to form nor the identity of the EU are arbitrarily selected, then the implication might be that what appears to be indecipherable in the final composition of a flag is, in fact, the result of a calculated proposition. If the EU takes itself too seriously during a time when there does not seem to be any current political force powerful enough to oppose US, and to a lesser extent, British imperialism, then RIF opens us up to this incongruous rivalry, by putting us, the masses, in the ranks of the EU. In other words, RIF challenges us to imagine ourselves, the citizens of the world, as the ‘Other Superpower’, while reminding us that as ‘players’ in the forum of RIF, we might, like the EU, be amusing ourselves by aspiring to contend with a mismatch – the US and its coalition.'
